For example, YouTube says the “insights” tool will be personalized so that new video ideas will take into account what a creator’s audience is already watching, something that other text generators can’t do without access to YouTube’s data. The main potential draw is that these AI tools would generate content based off of creators’ own historical output. YouTube’s new tools basically give creators an in-house option for much of this: Creators will be able to generate video prompts and script outlines, automatically edit clips together, and create AI-voiced dubs into other languages. Instead, these videos focus on explaining existing tools to generate scripts and voice-overs, and to create and edit together images for the video visuals. On the platform itself, it’s difficult to find videos discussing the tools at all, despite a thriving community of YouTubers who explain how to use AI tools in making videos - just not the ones announced by YouTube. On the YouTube Creators account on X (formerly known as Twitter), the announcement only picked up a few hundred likes, doing similarly to engagement-bait tweets like “how do you make your audience feel seen and heard?” On the main YouTube account, it performed worse than a tweet reading “stars are kinda just sky rocks.” But the quiet reception still seems to buck the trend. Maybe it’s the fact that YouTube’s tools aren’t available to the general public yet. Creators use the Bold Glamour filter to apply makeup, a Ghibli filter to look like characters from the studio’s films, and even pay a fee for filters that generate themed avatars - like the hugely popular ’90s high school photo filter. AI has also become a cornerstone of TikTok, particularly AI-powered filters. Prizes have been won by AI art, while some news sites cut their staff and put out AI-generated articles. On the other side of the coin, these tools have been used by many people, either experimentally or professionally. And then there’s generative AI’s issues with hallucination and inaccuracies. Martin and Jodi Picoult filed to sue OpenAI for scraping their books. Artists and writers have typically pushed back, citing issues like copyright and their own work being undermined - in September, high-profile authors including George R.R. It’s been a watershed year as generative AI tools have made it easier to create images and text, all generated from internet scrapes of others’ art and writing. Instead, YouTubers are sharing other concerns about the ways generative AI is already affecting the platform. But even as AI features have caused an uproar in so many other creative industries, the response to YouTube’s new suite of tools has been muted. The tools touch basically every part of the content creation process, from generating topics to editing and even generating video footage itself through the Dream Screen feature. In mid-September, YouTube announced a collection of new artificial intelligence tools coming to the platform.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |